login | register
Feb 09, 2010 [04:52 PM]

onNYTurf

Refresh cache

City Council Member Mendez Introducing Legislation to Overturn NYPD Parade Permit Rules

by Will
Sunday Mar 23, 2008
Posted to Front Page Posts
New York City Councilor Rosie Mendez (District 2, Manhattan), with Council Members Gale Brewer and Alan Gerson, is introducing a bill today to redefine NYC's parade permit rules. If enacted into law, the bill will override the parade permit rules created by the NYPD a year ago; the NYPD's parade permit rules were created without City Council oversight and require any group of 50 or more to obtain a permit (whether the group is violating any laws or not). Currently, anyone in such a group without a permit is subject to arrest. The legislation being introduced today, known as the First Amendment Assembly Act, would decriminalize parading without a permit. It is based on legislation put forward by Assemble For Rights NYC.

There is lots of good stuff in this bill which I will get to in a second. First however, lets review where this is in the process. There will now be a bill in City Council, and it is to be assigned to the Public Safety Committee. That committee is run by Peter Vallone. Bad news. The bill could simply die there. What it needs next is a hearing, which can happen at the request of the Committee chair Vallone, by clamoring from Committee members, or the fastest way to a hearing is by request from the City Council Speaker Christine Quinn. Ms. Quinn has a great opportunity now before her to make up for past apathy on this issue and shepherd this good bill into law.

So its going to be very important for people who care about this issue to start calling their city councilors and the Speaker and let her know how important this is to you. You can look up your city councilor here.

On to the stuff about this bill that is good...

The First Amendment Assembly Act is based on legislation drafted by the civil rights advocacy group Assemble For Rights NYC. So right there you know it is quality. The First Amendment Assembly Act reverts the role of a permit from the legal gotcha game we have come to enjoy the past year, back to a means for groups that need exceptions to various laws, such as traffic laws, to obtain such for their events.

A parade permit will NOT be required when:

  • A group believes their proposed assembly will not prevent other lawful uses of the same city public space and the expected attendance of the assembly will be less than 100, or
  • The assembly is an immediate and spontaneous response to an event.

The Act also sets forth guidelines for the NYPD to facilitate peaceful assemblies even when a group should have obtained a permit but does not. Furthermore The Act also encourages calmer resolutions to assemblies which become too difficult for the NYPD to facilitate: these guidelines include providing clearly communicated dispersal orders and reasonably opportunities to disperse before making any arrests.

This is the genius of this bill and why it is good for activists and the police. The rank and file police have been put in a horrible position by Ray Kelly and the top brass - forced to engage peaceful protesters under the most hostile terms. This bill would get everyone to just chill the hell out.

Don't think such a law is reasonable? For those who think this means Osama Bin Ladin will be holding marches in the streets of Manhattan I refer them to nothing less than Washington D.C. In DC, the city council passed very similar legislation in 2004. Its laws brought an end to violent clashes between police and protesters and has reduced that cities exposure to expensive wrongful arrest lawsuits. And yet, no terrists. Who'd a thunk.


Comments

Comments Filter
Reply to this comment

Why 100?

by RobCUNY, Thursday Mar 27, 2008 [09:29 AM]
Why should any number require a permit? As I remember it, we used to be able to assemble in any number as long as we didn't violate vagrancy law, obstruct traffic or "obstruct government function." Used to be, as I recall, the only permits we went to the police for were sound permits for megaphones or parade permits if we wanted to march in the street and obstruct traffic. Otherwise, the police might barricade us in somewhere within sight of our target, or they might arrest individuals for disorderly conduct if they made trouble (like looking at a cop the wrong way), but you could march along the street wherever you wanted to go. I remember going to the police to ask for a demonstration permit and being told — by the Community Affairs Officer — there is no permit to give, unless you want to use a megaphone.

Why are we giving up that right? Is there no political will to fight for it? Isn't this a foundational right of our nation?
--Rob
Reply to this comment

No Limit

by Will, Thursday Mar 27, 2008 [01:29 PM]
If you read the legislation you will see that there is no penalty if your group is larger than 100 and does not have a permit. Parading without a permit is decriminalized.

Like you say, the only reason to get a permit is if you want a waver of traffic and other such rules. This bill restores that.

The 100 looks like a feel good number to me for people who like numbers. But it has no bearing on enforcement. Parading without a permit is decriminalized. You should read the whole bill
Reply to this comment

by robcuny, Friday Mar 28, 2008 [06:13 AM]
Yes, the key is the establishment of police guidelines for handling unpermitted assemblies, the most restrictive of which are c.6&7:
"6. The Department shall, to the extent possible under the circumstances, seek to enforce reasonable and articulated time, place, or manner restrictions by clearly offering a real opportunity or opportunities for voluntary compliance.
7. Should individuals fail to avail themselves of such opportunity or opportunities, the Department may then seek, as appropriate, to enforce the restrictions by issuing summonses to, or by arresting, specific non-compliant persons, and shall attempt, when practicable, to refrain from issuing a general order to disperse, thus allowing the First Amendment assembly to continue."

That's more or less what was in place before the new police rules: the police tell you to go stand on the sidewalk across the street and if you don't, they arrest you. The 100 number seems to be an advisement for larger groups to plan with the police, which can be wise if you don't want surprises.
--rob
Reply to this comment

by robcuny, Friday Mar 28, 2008 [06:17 AM]
Just in case anyone else is reading, here's where the law can be downloaded:
http://www.assembleforrightsnyc.org/node/10
I hope that's the latest version.
Rob
Reply to this comment

by , Friday Mar 28, 2008 [11:10 PM]
Why 100? Because 100 is a guideline for groups debating on whether or not they should get a permit to guesstimate at what point the size a group in intself becomes obstructive of traffic. This differs depending on the location (100 people on atlantic ave is much different that 100 people on ludlow and rivington streets) So it's just a recommendation, really.

Blogs

Recent News From onNYTurf

NYC's Best Subway Map

NYC Subway Map

Tags cloud

Resist

Remember Guernica

Ad Free Blog

Ad Free

Keeping Count